Subterranean stereotypes - John C. Kirk — LiveJournal
Oct. 11th, 2010
07:22 pm - Subterranean stereotypes
There's been a bit of controversy from Andrew Marr today:
"A lot of bloggers seem to be socially inadequate, pimpled, single, slightly seedy, bald, cauliflower-nosed, young men sitting in their mother's basements and ranting."
(Source: Guardian, Telegraph.)
The bit that I find most interesting is the reference to basements; I've heard similar comments online for several years, but usually from Americans. I know a few adults who live with their parents (Failure to Launch), but they don't live in basements. If you already have a perfectly good bedroom, why would you want to live in a basement instead? More importantly, it's quite rare for English houses to have basements. The only place I've lived that had a basement was a house that had been converted into studio flats (3 per floor), so there was no significant difference between the basement and the ground floor. Also, if the basement flat is independent of the rest of the building, you're a neighbour (or tenant) rather than a flatmate. So, leaving aside any issue of maturity, I'd say that living in your parents' basement simply isn't an option for most people in this country, because it doesn't physically exist!
It may be different in the USA, and I realise that a lot of Americans tend to assume that everyone else on the internet is also from the USA, or that the rest of the world is the same as the USA. However, I'm surprised to hear someone from the BBC saying the same thing. So, maybe my experience isn't representative. What do the rest of you think?
How many houses have you lived in that had basements?
For the purposes of this question, it only counts if the building is one complete unit from ground level upwards.
Edit: Hmm, apparently the poll won't show the number of people who chose "0" unless you click "View answers". That's unhelpful, but never mind.